AdvertiseDonate
Thursday, November 5, 2026
Reporting on the stories people talk about.
Breaking Radio · 13750 San Pedro Ave, 7th Floor, San Antonio, TX 78232
Politics · National

Arch Dispute: Court Hears Arguments on Trump's 250-Foot Structure

Judge Tanya Chutkan will rule on a preliminary injunction request as construction could start November 5 without a final stop order.

By Neha Delgado ·

Illustration for: Arch Dispute: Court Hears Arguments on Trump's 250-Foot Structure
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., is set to hear arguments this Friday regarding a proposed 250-foot arch connecting Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan will determine whether to grant a preliminary injunction that would halt the project's construction before it begins.

The dispute pits the Justice Department against a group of Vietnam War veterans who filed suit earlier this year. The plaintiffs contend that the project has been rushed and lacks proper congressional approval. They point to a timeline suggesting construction could start as soon as November 5 if the National Capital Planning Commission grants final approval on that date.

In court papers filed ahead of the hearing, the plaintiffs argued that the public interest opposes the defendants moving forward too quickly. They requested that Chutkan block the project swiftly to prevent the administration from creating a fait accompli before the court reaches a final decision. The group also claimed the arch would disrupt the symbolic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and the Robert E. Lee Memorial, a view intended to convey unity after the Civil War.

Shaun Byrnes, one of the plaintiffs, previously described his opposition as a duty to colleagues who did not return from the war. He stated that the project feels disrespectful to those who served and to the individuals buried in Arlington National Cemetery.

The Justice Department has responded by calling the plaintiffs' motions breathless and urging the judge to follow recent precedent. Government attorneys argued that the challenge should be dismissed because the plaintiffs lack proper legal standing. They cited a Supreme Court decision regarding the White House ballroom, stating that aesthetic and emotional displeasure does not establish a concrete injury.

According to filings from earlier this month, the first six months of construction would involve below-ground and foundation work. The Justice Department argued this phase would not interfere with the plaintiffs' claims of irreparable harm related to the sightline. The administration also submitted sworn declarations from Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Hegseth declared that the arch represents a generational national defense opportunity. He and Mullin stated that the structure would allow the military and Secret Service to defend the capital against drone attacks and other threats. President Trump had previously posted on Truth Social in September that the arch would become a top-grade military complex equipped with snipers and drones.

Arlington County has also sued in federal court in Virginia to block the project. The county argues the arch would require changes to flight paths for planes entering and leaving Ronald Reagan International Airport. They have asked a judge there to order an environmental review, while the administration maintains the structure will not pose a hazard to nearby flights.

Source: CBS News

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Breaking Radio in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Breaking Radio in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.